Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
Sixshot6

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#21 Post by Sixshot6 »

And that is what makes said law an ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That can't even be turned into glue afterwards. lol
bigfathairybiker

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#22 Post by bigfathairybiker »

I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh wtf

Mark
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#23 Post by meles meles »

Silly and not serious ? On here?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Sixshot6

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#24 Post by Sixshot6 »

bigfathairybiker wrote:I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh wtf

Mark
Ok I'll admit I got a bit overboard, but if Hunter vixen's interpretation is the right one and taken to its logical extreme then yes the law is a buggered up mess. One of the reasons having the house of commons full of chimps would be not a bad thing is that we can teach the chimps and right from wrong and they'll mainly fling poo in the commons and not outside of it.
huntervixen

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#25 Post by huntervixen »

Sixshot6 wrote:
bigfathairybiker wrote:I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh wtf

Mark
Ok I'll admit I got a bit overboard, but if Hunter vixen's interpretation is the right one and taken to its logical extreme then yes the law is a buggered up mess. One of the reasons having the house of commons full of chimps would be not a bad thing is that we can teach the chimps and right from wrong and they'll mainly fling poo in the commons and not outside of it.


How Very true...... clapclap ....... While my Sec5b shotgun post is a little "tongue in cheek" ;) , it does raise the issue of our ridiculous contradictory and darn right flawed Firearms laws, just have a read through the Firearms Act......(It took me 10 mins to find the 12 bore issue) If it was a legal contract that you had paid a solicitor to draft, you you would sue them for incompetence!
Sixshot6

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#26 Post by Sixshot6 »

huntervixen wrote:
Sixshot6 wrote:
bigfathairybiker wrote:I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh wtf

Mark
Ok I'll admit I got a bit overboard, but if Hunter vixen's interpretation is the right one and taken to its logical extreme then yes the law is a buggered up mess. One of the reasons having the house of commons full of chimps would be not a bad thing is that we can teach the chimps and right from wrong and they'll mainly fling poo in the commons and not outside of it.


How Very true...... clapclap ....... While my Sec5b shotgun post is a little "tongue in cheek" ;) , it does raise the issue of our ridiculous contradictory and darn right flawed Firearms laws, just have a read through the Firearms Act......(It took me 10 mins to find the 12 bore issue) If it was a legal contract that you had paid a solicitor to draft, you you would sue them for incompetence!
And considering some MP's are former lawyers it speaks volumes of why they stopped practicing.
Countryman

Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#27 Post by Countryman »

I offered advice to the guy concerned.

He got prosecuted not because his guns were front venting but because he had the cup device necessary to discharge CS and he had CS canisters for discharge.

It has previously been proven in court that because something can be adapted to be illegal does not mean it is itself illegal.

A fairy liquid bottle is not illegal but fill it with acid/ammonia and its lethal.

If the blank firer was designed to discharge a missile from the outset its section 5.
zanes

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#28 Post by zanes »

Countryman wrote:I offered advice to the guy concerned.

He got prosecuted not because his guns were front venting but because he had the cup device necessary to discharge CS and he had CS canisters for discharge.
zanes wrote:
bigfathairybiker wrote:I would not be surprised if the story told to Gunmart is only a small portion of the truth.
A bit like the story that was told here on FB only to found out a while after.....
+1. Always the way with these sorting of stories.
No further comment, M'lud. 8-)
Countryman

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#29 Post by Countryman »

Not for him he got 2 years
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10753
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5

#30 Post by Sim G »

Countryman wrote:Not for him he got 2 years

More to do with the CS, than with the "gun"?
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests