Doctors charging

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2860
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: Doctors charging

#21 Post by Dark Skies »

Frankly I'm surprised anybody interested in shooting sports confides in their GP at all these days.
It's got to the point that you are watching for self-incriminating questions and are moved to lie about the slightest things to future proof against unintended consequences.
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
Furiouspilgrim

Re: Doctors charging

#22 Post by Furiouspilgrim »

Dark Skies wrote:Frankly I'm surprised anybody interested in shooting sports confides in their GP at all these days.
It's got to the point that you are watching for self-incriminating questions and are moved to lie about the slightest things to future proof against unintended consequences.
Said this to a mate months ago. People will be afraid to go to the docs, for something that is perfectly treatable, but without treatment, could be an issue. Crazy situation.
User avatar
safetyfirst
Posts: 2651
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
Contact:

Re: Doctors charging

#23 Post by safetyfirst »

Terrible situation this. People with treatable depression for whom their weekly range trip is one of the few bits of pleasure in life.

It just breeds paranoia, depression and isolation. There has to be a more sensible solution.
User avatar
Pete
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 3093
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 8:48 am
Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
Contact:

Re: Doctors charging

#24 Post by Pete »

Has anyone's doctor actually been solely instrumental in a refusal to grant or renew an FAC yet?

Pete
"Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum" Lucretius
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7856
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Doctors charging

#25 Post by Blackstuff »

Pete wrote:Has anyone's doctor actually been solely instrumental in a refusal to grant or renew an FAC yet?

Pete
I'd like to know this too, especially for anyone who has no 'conditions'/issues. I just can't see an appeal being upheld on it at all.
DVC
Christel
Site Admin
Posts: 17536
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: Wind Swept Denmark
Contact:

Re: Doctors charging

#26 Post by Christel »

Dorset_shooter wrote:
If I didn't really love this sport I would have chucked the towel in along time ago.
One would think there is an agenda from higher up wtf
Laurie

Re: Doctors charging

#27 Post by Laurie »

Furiouspilgrim wrote:
Dark Skies wrote:Frankly I'm surprised anybody interested in shooting sports confides in their GP at all these days.
It's got to the point that you are watching for self-incriminating questions and are moved to lie about the slightest things to future proof against unintended consequences.
Said this to a mate months ago. People will be afraid to go to the docs, for something that is perfectly treatable, but without treatment, could be an issue. Crazy situation.
I discussed this with my GP on my last renewal. She told me that doctors are aware of this issue and concerned about it. However, it is not new nor do FAC/SGC holders provide the primary dilemma. There is a large and growing number of conditions that should be reported to the DVLA and where the driving license will likely be withdrawn. There are others that may affect people's ability to drive safely, but aren't mandated for automatic reporting, but the GP will advise the patient not to drive. If he or she continues to do so or refuses the treatment that puts the GP on the spot.

With the need to drive vital to everyday life and in many cases employment for huge numbers of people, GPs are very concerned that patients avoid treatment or refuse to take drugs that have side effects that affect driving ability, also of the moral and medical difficulty that a 'marginal medical call' places on doctors. 'Playing safe' can see a doctor destroy somebody's livelihood or ability to remain in their home perhaps unnecessarily; go the other way and a potentially dangerous driver remains on the road or his/her long-term health suffers.

The same issues affect non-recreational SGC/FAC holders of course. Many people such as gamekeepers and estate workers may lose not only their job, but also a tied house if a health issue results in the certificate being suspended. Some such have told me they won't go to a doctor at all now unless it's essnential.
artiglio

Re: Doctors charging

#28 Post by artiglio »

All thrown into chaos, when you consider the Glasgow Dustcart driver who repeatedly misled doctors as to his health, ending when he passed out at the wheel killing 6 people. He wasn't prosecuted, lost his licence and subsequently caught driving when he had his ban extended.
So perception for many may well be, hiding an issue is a gamble worth taking.
User avatar
Pete
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 3093
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 8:48 am
Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
Contact:

Re: Doctors charging

#29 Post by Pete »

When I first started shooting back in the 70's, there was apparently a far smaller "perceived risk" when it came to issuing FAC's.
I don't remember having to involve a GP unless I'd nominated one as a referee.
I can only conclude that Joe Public is becoming more stupid, and more dangerous, as time goes by, not to mention more numerous..............

Pete
"Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum" Lucretius
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
artiglio

Re: Doctors charging

#30 Post by artiglio »

Given todays news regarding Dr. Watt, perhaps the focus is in the wrong place.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests