Home Office Firearms Consultation
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
No, wouldn’t work. Socialist Republic of Scotland has shown that, and not just in firearms licensing.
Despite our small country, the diversity of each county is striking.
Despite our small country, the diversity of each county is striking.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
- Dark Skies
- Posts: 2860
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
- Home club or Range: NRA
- Contact:
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
I've often thought that. Especially when reading about Derbyshire's well over the top responses to people going out to exercise during lockdown as compared to, say, Thames Valley Police who appear to be very reasonable.Pete wrote:Hands up all those who feel a single national police force with a clear detailed description of duties/responsibilities would be preferable to the current state of affairs..........
Pete
However, what if we were to end up with the worst attitude throughout the land?
At least under the current arrangement there are pockets of reasonable adherence to guidelines.
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
- Blackstuff
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 7852
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
Well I emailed BASC about their consultation response suggestion and at first was reactionarily defensive but following further emails have took onboard my, and my others on here interpretation/spotting the way this could be misused against FAC holders/legitimate people*. Whether they'll actually change their suggested response/do it in time that all their members that bother to respond will be captured by is of course an entirely different matter.
*using the wildly optimistic assumption this wasn't the purpose in the first place.

*using the wildly optimistic assumption this wasn't the purpose in the first place.

DVC
- Pete
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 8:48 am
- Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
- Contact:
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
Dark Skies said: "At least under the current arrangement there are pockets of reasonable adherence to guidelines."
Which is great.........if you happen to live in one.
Pete
Which is great.........if you happen to live in one.

Pete
"Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum" Lucretius
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
-
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:57 pm
- Home club or Range: Any field
- Contact:
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
survey completed today
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
Consultation (haha..) deadline tomorrow Monday 15th February.
Three responses sent back from the adults in this household, but the expression "pi**ing in the wind" comes to mind. Not really expecting to see any outcome other than the usual Home Office rubber stamp - and the subsequent issue of the next set of proposed bans and restrictions.
Three responses sent back from the adults in this household, but the expression "pi**ing in the wind" comes to mind. Not really expecting to see any outcome other than the usual Home Office rubber stamp - and the subsequent issue of the next set of proposed bans and restrictions.
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
This will be interesting, virtually everyone I know or have read about has replied so the uptake must be massive. What is the betting it turns out just 1,023 people replied.
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
I did the consultation a few days ago. I am of the opinion that whatever the results of the consultation the Home Office will say thanks for your input, but we are going to do what we want anyway. It is only a box ticking exercise. I mentioned on the young people with air guns section that I used to go about the farm on my own from about the age of 12 with a .410 shotgun because I didn't have an air gun. I also mentioned that my dad didn't need any type of certificate to buy the shotgun from the local ironmongers shop either.
It was my brother's shotgun really, he got it for his 16th birthday, a Cooey Model 84 single barrel .410. Unfortunately, a few years later, his son fired it with something in the end of the barrel and made a sort of muzzle brake out of the last couple of inches of barrel.
Regards
Peter.
It was my brother's shotgun really, he got it for his 16th birthday, a Cooey Model 84 single barrel .410. Unfortunately, a few years later, his son fired it with something in the end of the barrel and made a sort of muzzle brake out of the last couple of inches of barrel.
Regards
Peter.
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
I responded and contacted my MP, who for once has shown some interest and asked for my views/comments to be sent to him. Obviously doesn’t mean much but at least he’ll get a different opinion. Its only the consultation , a way to go before and legislation is passed.
Re: Home Office Firearms Consultation
I've responded to this today. I've been making notes about it before about points to raise, and then when getting to submit the comments I typed them up and realised we are limited to 250 words. Its poor when you have to find the least important parts of your statements to try to cut them out whilst still getting the point over. Either way I still have a copy of all my responses and my other notes so if this gets further, I can forward them across to my MP. Although I do agree with comments above about this being a box ticking exercise where responses will be ignored.
I just find such a section about reloading will be harming to most of us especially in the way they have written it.
I've only been shooting for 5 years and really don't want to get the "chipping away" mentality that many other shooters and club members seem to have after a lifetime of law changes. We still need to oppose these consultations and legislation changes when they are being raised/discussed.
I just find such a section about reloading will be harming to most of us especially in the way they have written it.
I've only been shooting for 5 years and really don't want to get the "chipping away" mentality that many other shooters and club members seem to have after a lifetime of law changes. We still need to oppose these consultations and legislation changes when they are being raised/discussed.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests