Page 2 of 2
Re: Which smle is this ?
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:53 pm
by dromia
Why chop it into a No5 when it is a No4?
Better just to restock it and save it to its original configuration rather than butcher it further and have something of no value financially or historically.
Re: Which smle is this ?
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:20 pm
by frogland
I can see your point.
Re: Which smle is this ?
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:33 pm
by huntervixen
saddler wrote:huntervixen wrote:She could be "re-militarised", the barrel looks to be untouched? .... got out of that pansy civilian dress and back into proper military fatigues !
Sez the person with a wrongly-scoped A4 icon. ...naughty bad!
Been gradually doing a very similar rebuild/re-militarisation, on a Fazakerly made No.4 that'd been sporterised & 410'd in the past.
The prices being charged for sets of wood is bordering on daylight robbery....but by waiting for non-dealer (militaria variery, not rfd) sales online, I eventually got the parts required. Just waiting for barrel bands/caps & a magazine.
Restoring can be done...so maybe worth considering as a project. ..
My dear Hamster, take the weight off , crack open a can of Irn Bru and do a spot of reading up... its a given that A4's were used in the Korean war, its also a given that commercial Lyman Alaskan scopes were used in the Korean war (examples below).... So it is indeed quite plausible (given combined Army/Marine Corps Ordnance) that Alaskans were used on A4's in Korea!
"Korean War scopes - In 1951 the government reportedly purchased 3000 Lyman Alaskan scopes for the widening Korean Conflict."
"Senich's book on Marine Corps snipers shows a photo of a Marine in Korea during a February 1953 firing an M1C equipped with 'a commercial Lyman Alaskan All-Weather telescope".