All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://ns1.full-bore.co.uk/
You're laughing but detonating a nuclear bomb in Britain was only made a crime in the mid 2000's!!huntervixen wrote:Well, it certainly looks promising, though a potentially crushing blow for illegal automatic converters of semi automatic firearms, they will become.... sort of doubly illegal !
I think its a cracking idea to ban already prohibited firearms, that will keep the EU Parliament busy for months with even more pointless red tape while we prepare to vote OUT of the EU!
I will email the EU politburo with the suggestion that 1950's style nuclear tipped artillery shells should also be carefully considered for the ban list...
edit...Just occurred to me that nuclear tipped artillery shells might already be banned as expanding ammunition!
aaarggh aaarggh 
gunlikehuntervixen wrote:ahhhh HH1 used the bad "W" word, we need a reasonable adult to reprimand him please
But just imagine a scenario where somehow one was detonated and no one was hurt/killed (underwater/underground/Batman flys it out to seaHH1 wrote:Its is a crime to unlawfully kill another human being..... so surely it is a moot point as to what weapon is used?
Its the catch 22 situation of only law-abiding people obey laws.... criminals don't obey laws
), and then the government couldn't charge the person with a crime Other than perhaps some kind of environmental pollution etcAhh no, some people actually think that one firearm or weapon can be "especially more dangerous" than another. Yeah well a nuke is more dangerous than say a catty I supposeIts is a crime to unlawfully kill another human being..... so surely it is a moot point as to what weapon is used?
As a youngster I read about a dubious fellow called Chung who had a fondness for wielding his 'clicky-ba' in the N/W frontier.dromia wrote:Anything that is used to kill someone with intent is obviously a weapon.