Page 2 of 2

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:39 pm
by bradaz11
meh, just look on it as one less scumbag, we spend enough time moaning folk dont get locked up for things....

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:45 pm
by joe
bradaz11 wrote:meh, just look on it as one less scumbag, we spend enough time moaning folk dont get locked up for things....


Yer he was definitely a wrong'en by looks of
It !

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 2:15 pm
by HALODIN
It would have been more interesting to know who made the obsolete calibre ammo.

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 2:26 pm
by bradaz11
HALODIN wrote:It would have been more interesting to know who made the obsolete calibre ammo.
magtech, Privi, S&B all make 32 S&W long

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 2:29 pm
by Sixshot6
HALODIN wrote:It would have been more interesting to know who made the obsolete calibre ammo.
as Brad said, it aint that obsolete. I'm sure guns are still available in it.

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 3:54 pm
by mowdy
32 long is still available my mate has a Horsly took rifle in 32 long after it was bored out to 410 then
Later fitted with a rifled barrel liner

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:52 pm
by Hrun
How is this a story?

If it is a legal S5 and not his then I am guessing he shouldn't be touching it and both he and the owner should be prosecuted to ensure the sheeple are confident our stupid laws are working and they do not threaten my hobby.

If is was illegal, then it is not S5 and proof the laws are meaningless.. so throw away the key.

Re: Firearms conviction.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:09 am
by Mattnall
Sim G wrote:From the article;

"However, in court he pleaded guilty to possessing a prohibited American Colt Police Positive Special .32 weapon."

What's the issue?
Rockhopper wrote:So as i said, there is more to the incident than is being reported.
Rockhopper, did you actually read to the bottom of article you linked to or just the headline? 8-)