Page 2 of 2
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:02 pm
by Christel
When you are deemed suitable and that is down to your FEO.
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:58 pm
by Gazza
Dellboy wrote:so does that mean you can invite me Gazza ?
Not sure Dell, I now know I'm lawfull where I am and when I'm on my own. Add variables and I'm back to square one
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:51 pm
by Dellboy
Gazza wrote:Dellboy wrote:so does that mean you can invite me Gazza ?
Not sure Dell, I now know I'm lawfull where I am and when I'm on my own. Add variables and I'm back to square one
NORTHERN HOSPITALITY FFS
IS THAT BECAUSE ITS YOUR ROUND .........
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:07 pm
by Gazza
Dellboy wrote:Gazza wrote:Dellboy wrote:so does that mean you can invite me Gazza ?
Not sure Dell, I now know I'm lawfull where I am and when I'm on my own. Add variables and I'm back to square one
NORTHERN HOSPITALITY FFS
IS THAT BECAUSE ITS YOUR ROUND .........
Now now! Dont be having me get the black pudding out........... again!
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:13 pm
by Gazza
Dellboy wrote:so does that mean you can invite me Gazza ?
I'll have a word with farmer palmer when I next go up and see what he says
Do you plan on coming up here often? Can you get me a shoot on Jamie Olivers land?
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:33 pm
by Dellboy
love the profile pic xx
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:06 pm
by Gazza
Kushty!
Re: FAC wording part ll
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:47 pm
by The Lord Flashheart
Gazza wrote:The Lord Flashheart wrote:Not necessarily, otherwise how could you shoot on invites?
Ahhh, I didnt know that I could??
I thought I was restricted to the land I put on my variation?
Not any more. :)
There is no such thing as an "open" or "closed" ticket in law.
There are however various proscribed conditions that can be added to certificates and the geographical conditions are an example of these.
On first grants for vermin shooting it is usual ( though by no means absolute ) to have the piece of ground that you and the FEO presumably walked listed on your ticket as the only place the firearms to which it relates to be used. The idea is that an inexperienced shot would be be safest sticking to the known and "signed off".
This then progresses to "land that the chief constable...etc" as a means of limiting the use of firearms by the relatively inexperienced to those places known to be safe.
The final step involves the removal of the geographical condition completely and is appropriate when the shot is safe enough to know where and when to shoot.
A cynic might take the view that enough land clearance requests sent in a steady stream to the FEO might show that the new shooter has gathered lots of experience in a short space of time, as evidenced by the requests from people for him to shoot their land, and might consider removing the geographical restriction sooner than is perhaps customary.