Re: Help me decide, .308 or 6.5CM?
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:08 pm
I'll be shooting this rifle out to 500 yards regularly, reaching out to 1000 maybe 5 or 6 times a year. I think from what people have been saying, those who have a 6.5 and a .308 find themselves reaching for the 6.5 more often. I hadn't really thought about the 6.5x55, just because the rifle I want isn't offered in it. I suppose if I really think about it, if I'm buying a rifle that will cost me £3000 between the rifle, scope, rings and other bits, I might as well have it be as capable as possible. So what does your 6.5 ammo end up costing you when you reload? I've done some quick pricing up and not including brass cost its looking around the 80p a round mark. I might just have to try to push up my plans to start reloading!Triffid wrote:I shoot a Howa varmint in 308 and a Ruger Precision Rifle in 6.5cm. My normal ranges are 600 and 1000 yards at Bisley. The Howa wears a Fox scope and needs a 20MOA rail to get out to 1000x. The RPR has a Sightron SIII.
I don't currently reload for the 308 as the NRA sells GGG ammo with the 155gn SMK at £16/20 which is only marginally above my real cost to replicate - 43p for the bullet, 24p for the powder and 4p for the primer. The Howa 'likes' the GGG ammunition, so it's really not worth my time to reload for it . . . I could of course go with a cheaper bullet but I'm saving that up for when the NRA runs out of the GGG.
I do reload for the 6.5cm however. Cost per bang is about the same as the 308 but as you have found, factory ammo in 6.5cm is twice the price of the GGG 308, so there's a big saving for me.
Accuracy-wise I don't find much in it at 600x. However at 1000x I'm noticeably better with the 6.5. This probably relates to my shooting skills and wind reading more than the rifle/ammo. The 6.5 relies less on shooter skills as TJC points out.
Have you thought of 6.5x55? That could get you to the best of both worlds.
Triffid