AR Build

Anything Fullbore rifle related, Hunting, Target, Match.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
John MH

Re: AR Build

#21 Post by John MH »

Sandgroper wrote:Well, ask Grizzley and get the answer!

My original post was replying to your question regarding proof
John MH wrote:Wasn't it proofed before you pulled the trigger?
and now seems to be going around in circles very quickly.

I wasn't asking you the question, I know the regulations.
User avatar
Mattnall
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 2943
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:32 pm
Home club or Range: NRA, Redricks TSC, BS1944RC, HRA
Location: East Herts
Contact:

Re: AR Build

#22 Post by Mattnall »

Mattnall wrote:The home builder can import all the bits and build it himself and without proof (as long as he has authority to possess in the first place). If anything went wrong on a range and it was found the rifle wasn't proofed then there would be interesting times for all trying to get compensation (for whatever damage or injury occurred -and Heaven forbid if it was an MoD range).

As John says, the RFD should have given it over if it wasn't proofed.

Best not to get too in depth at this stage, in case the worms leave the can.

Well done on the build though, looks like you have a nice rifle and the satisfaction of assembling it yourself.

Oops,
That should have read "As John says, the RFD shouldn't have given it over if it wasn't proofed."
Arming the Country, one gun at a time.

Good deals with Paul101, Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.
breacher

Re: AR Build

#23 Post by breacher »

Is the same rifle build that was posted a few months ago, then entire thread deleted after such questions regarding proof, then reappeared but author had changed his identity ?
Grizzly

Re: AR Build

#24 Post by Grizzly »

breacher wrote:Is the same rifle build that was posted a few months ago, then entire thread deleted after such questions regarding proof, then reappeared but author had changed his identity ?
It does look familiar. I think it is. :wave:
User avatar
BamBam
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: Royston vasey
Contact:

Re: AR Build

#25 Post by BamBam »

John MH wrote:
I wasn't asking you the question, I know the regulations.
You mean like having a barrel slot on your FAC to self import the parts? Is that how the regulation works?
Image
Christel
Site Admin
Posts: 17535
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: Wind Swept Denmark
Contact:

Re: AR Build

#26 Post by Christel »

breacher wrote:Is the same rifle build that was posted a few months ago, then entire thread deleted after such questions regarding proof, then reappeared but author had changed his identity ?
That is not exactly how it happened, never mind though, end result was that the thread was removed at the request of the OP due to some less than gentlemanly behaviour on another forum.

That sort of behaviour is not tolerated on FB. I do not need to explain what I mean by that because I am confident that the people behaving in this way knows what I mean. Don't bring it here.

Also the latest user who signed up with a totally idiotic user name just to have a dig at another user, obviously you are not being let in and I suggest you find yourself another hobby to spend your time on when you are drunk. I can only assume you were drunk because no normal sober person behaves that way.

I am not responding to any questions regarding this. Just know FB is not tolerating this behaviour.
breacher

Re: AR Build

#27 Post by breacher »

I was just asking, thats all............seemed to ring a bell.
Christel
Site Admin
Posts: 17535
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: Wind Swept Denmark
Contact:

Re: AR Build

#28 Post by Christel »

breacher wrote:I was just asking, thats all............seemed to ring a bell.
Not aimed at you Breacher. Just that your post was the perfect starting point for my rant. tongueout
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests