Grizzly - a poster earlier in the thread says each export license costs $250. That is not correct. Especially as end users don't usually qualify as ITAR exporters, one has to be an FFL or a Manufacturer or otherwise registered as ITAR controlled.
It's not something someone at home can do as a DSP-5 is only issued to people who are registered under ITAR and they have FFLs (for the most part) or are registered an manufacturing ITAR controlled items and other such things. I guess its technically possible you could get a one off approval but I've never heard of it. As an example you must have paid the $2250 ITAR registration fee, plus they need your DUNS and CAGE to quickly process the license. CAGE is optional I think, DUNS is mandatory.
So even for a one time export, your paperwork fees are $3K.
In a post later there was also some confusion over DPS83, that is simply a form that goes alongside an application, it is not the export license or the export license application. The DSP-5 is the export license. The application for a DSP-5 requires the following:
Application itself which is done on a Government controlled IBM online form
DSP-83 (explanation of what you intend to export)
Contract (seller and buyer contract agreeing to sell/buy)
Certification Letter (US Citizen letter saying you are authorized to export)
Explanation of use (what is the end user going to do with the items, if the answer is build a technical truck and shoot kafirs then likely to be denied ;-)
Import License (if applicable)
Letter of Intent (signed by the end user)
Order of goods (the actual purchase order for everything on the export license)
Freight Forwarder information (99% of people use forwarders as it's illegal to ship via USPS and Fedex generally deny transport, so things are mostly moved via forwarders at key airports)
And any supplementary evidence such as prior approvals etc.
The above constitutes a valid application that is likely to be approved.
As someone else pointed out, specific details are needed. In the old days (1 year ago ish) they would approve 'AR-15 Receiver'. That is no longer the case and they want specific make/model etc before approving.
This is actually a good thing for people like me because I have legal exclusivity on a couple of products which customs have copies of, so if someone tries to export an item only I'm allowed to export, their shipment gets held and denied.
The US side of it, because of ITAR, is very time consuming and paperwork heavy.
In previous posts people have made it seem easy, it might be if you are one of the many people who use exporting FFLs who do this business (as you may have guessed I am one of those) but in reality the paperwork burden is huge and hard to do for a single sender and end user type arrangement and unless its high value, not financially viable.
The large FFL exporters do it because of servicing multiple customers therefore costs are spread.
The point I am making is from an end users point of view, one a one time item, its a near insurmountable task and very expensive.
That does not stop people buying things in the USA and filling a suitcase etc. The issue there of course is the US Customs and the US Defense directorate take a dim view of such things and have issued warrants for people caught doing it, like Guy Savage mentioned above.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2011 ... -arrested/