The UK's Finest Independent Forum for Shooters and Gun Owners. Est 2010.

i can be trusted to own and keep an ar-10 sharp shooter rifle in 7.62mm designed as a battle rifle from start but cannot be trusted to own a measly 9mm pistol ! can anyone see logic to this !

That's your mistake, looking logic.

It's not about the size of the hole it's about concealment.

It's not about the size of the hole it's about concealment.

I would say a LBP would be easily concealed, so i don't see concealment as a reason for the ban. What reason did they give at the time of the ban. ?

Concealment AFAIK.

No it wasn't the reason for the ban was to stop another dunblane nothing to do with cancelment !
If one can be trusted with an fac why would he illegally carry a firearm ! Oh i forgot we are all potentially criminal nutters

...and the reason Dunblane was made easier was because of concealment.

and the reason Dunblane was made easier was because of concealment.

Have you a link or any evidence that was given showing that concealment was a factor. Or is it just your opinion. ?

hungerford masscare, no cacealement he killed 14

I plan to purchase the Sig so have got Mike to send over a quote, just need to wait until end of March for delivery.

Why .22 are they doing a 9MM version.

ordnance wrote:

I plan to purchase the Sig so have got Mike to send over a quote, just need to wait until end of March for delivery.

Why .22 are they doing a 9MM version.

We're only allowed semi auto in .22.