If Explosive wants to use the American anti global warming propaganda that is available online to discuss global warming then so be it. I know he is wrong and so do millions of other people globally which is why they are discussing it and trying to find solutions to the man-made damage that has been happening since the Industrial Revolution.
I am not even going to come up with examples, just looking out the window is enough...
Just to defend my mention of American anti global warming propaganda, the US has a huge stake in production globally, the country's consumption is staggering compared to the rest of the world.
It's today's kids I feel sorry for...............we've done them no favours at all.
Too late to play the "blame game" now............
Pete
"Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum" Lucretius
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
safetyfirst wrote:As far as I can tell, the overwhelming majority of steps people propose to tackle climate change have SO MANY other benefits that I don't give a hoot about the climate change debate.
The cheaper energy, improved air quality, better food, less pressured healthcare system and improved transport are enough for me.
Who cares about the climate change debate.
How is it possible to debate climate change, when the climate is always changing and always has done ?
If all you care about is semantics and you fail to address the points in someone's argument. it's not possible.
One afternoon about 20 years ago in Co Sligo on the West coast of Ireland I sat on a rock and smoked a cigarette. I was about to stub out the cigarette on the rock when I noticed that the rock was chunk of fossilized coral. The seas around the British Isles were once tropical. Who is responsible for the cooling ?
christel wrote:If Explosive wants to use the American anti global warming propaganda that is available online to discuss global warming then so be it. I know he is wrong and so do millions of other people globally which is why they are discussing it and trying to find solutions to the man-made damage that has been happening since the Industrial Revolution.
I am not even going to come up with examples, just looking out the window is enough...
Just to defend my mention of American anti global warming propaganda, the US has a huge stake in production globally, the country's consumption is staggering compared to the rest of the world.
Serious question................ If warming is bad for life on earth why is it that the warmer places have the greatest diversity of life, and the coldest places the least ?