Re: Seriously?
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 8:00 am
How do you know that vegans and animal rights activists all live in cities?
Pete
Pete
All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://ns1.full-bore.co.uk/
Because a few years ago I had to move to a big city for work (hated every minute of it and have thankfully now left) and living in the countryside both before and after you never hear a word of it. Living in the city its EVERYWHERE!!!Pete wrote:How do you know that vegans and animal rights activists all live in cities?
Pete
Couldn't agree more. A not-insignificant amount of horses have been put down at my local hunt over the years due to the work of the bloody Sabs!! Trip wires to break legs and throwing paint in horses eyes to blind them seem to be their favourite games. "Animal Rights Activists" eh?..... And their attacks on people are just as bad. My old man once opened a letter than was posted through his door with a letter opener. Good job he did because there was a razor blade taped in side it!christel wrote:Actually having thought about it I know of a couple who lives in the countryside and frankly they are a pest for their surroundings.
Not born and bred but incomers.
They have a go at the local hunt whenever they can and try to upset as many people as possible by interfering with the business of the local council.
In fact I get the impression they are doing it more out of spite than conviction.
Antis are dreadful people, it is not their opinion that is the problem, it is their approach which is so full of hate.
Incorrect. You seem all to quick to jump to the assumption that I agree with all forms of hunting... I don't. I completely disagree with hunting that serves no purpose. Hunting must have a reason behind it. Either food, or culling, or protection of other animals/property. Pure trophy hunting that serves no purpose other than the gratification of the hunter is, as you put it, barbaric.Pete wrote:So, an animal lover who simply considers hunting with dogs and shooting inedible wildlife to be barbaric, and says so, is in the same category as the terrorists who sabotage hunts and endanger lives???
Pete
Pippin89 wrote: ... Pure trophy hunting that serves no purpose other than the gratification of the hunter is, as you put it, barbaric.