You are a full-member of a club which grants you good reason for those firearms that are available to be fired at the club.bradaz11 wrote: I'm a full member with an FAC, I have access to whatever I can justify to my FEO, that doesn't mean the club should undertake it on themselves to have everything to 'train' me. safety baseline is the basics are just that, basics, and why do you need different mechanisms and shapes to prove that. that seems more than some sort of baseline....
also, why can a full club member not be shown how to use the rifle 3 years down the line if you suddenly develop an interest?
note, I'm not saying introductions to all the firearms the club has is a bad thing, a few rounds out of each gun to get a taste is nothing but a good thing, but to force folk to try things, and then mark them down as somehow being trained is odd in my eyes, and even on a taster, people will be totally uninterested.
It is the clubs responsibility to make sure you are safe and competent in order to possess the good reason to acquire these firearms.
Without full-membership you do not have good reason for the firearms and cannot have them on your FAC.
How do you not think that it's the clubs responsibility to at least try to make sure you are safe with the classes of firearms that they cover you for on your FAC?
With regards to the latter part I believe you are misinterpreting what i'm saying about being conversant in each of the classes of firearms. Simple knowing how they operate, where the safety is, and if there are any differing courses of fire, what to know and do would be enough.
Of course someone could get trained 3 years on, but the onus then is on that person to ask for it, rather than make sure everyone has a safety baseline when they are granted full-membership to cover the clubs arse should anything happen due to them not being proficient with the classes of firearms they are able to then buy.