Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Found this after a reference to it on another forum. It is an extract from the FIREARMS LIAISON COMMITTEE MEETING DEVON AND CORNWALL CONSTABULARY Held at: Fowey Suite - Police Headquarters –10:00, 09 March 2011
B Collacott - Firearm Licensing Operations Officer
PDF link
http://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/Onl ... 110309.pdf
M Squire - RFD - Deer ConsultantBullet Construction and Hand Loading
A long discussion ensured concerning the construction of bullets.Mike Squire raised the problem of the classification of expanding ammunition and its use on ranges and for wildlife management. He was aware from conversations with customers that many did not understand how to
differentiate between certain types of bullet. He asked when the current restrictions on the possession and use of expanding ammunition would be amended, as hinted at in previous meetings. He pointed out that some American manufactured ammunition with ballistic tips were designed to be dual purpose, for use both as target ammunition and for wildlife management. Bullets that were described as target or expanding rounds in their literature externally appeared identical. He had sectioned a range of ballistic tipped bullets, described by the manufacturer as target or expanding, and compared them with bullets described as dual purpose. He could detect no difference in
construction. Barry Collacott said he believed that until the law was changed, bullets should continue to be treated as either target or expanding for wildlife management, not dual purpose. Mike Squire questioned how this would be checked and enforced by the authorities when the loaded bullets of each type could not be differentiated when stood side by side. Barry suggested the legislation was unenforceable.
B Collacott - Firearm Licensing Operations Officer
PDF link
http://www.devon-cornwall.police.uk/Onl ... 110309.pdf