Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:43 pm
I'm not saying that the politics doesn't need dealing with...I agree that it does, but by the right bodies in the right way...why can't some bodies remain apolitical?Blu wrote:Dougan,While I agree with you that shooting should be about getting new blood involved unfortunately these days it also has to some degree become political as well. My reasoning for that is nearly all decisions regarding what you can shoot, where you can shoot, licensing, well just about everything is made at a political level. You say that getting folks into the sport could be more effective than petitions that are unlikely to reach 100,000, fair enough but at the same time petitions also let your political masters know that there are rumblings within the shooting community and that you're not happy about something.But does that mean that all and every shooting organisation has to be political?
These days if you want any changes made with regards to firearms law then you have to be prepared to get involved politically because that's who you are going to be dealing with to get things done. As for the petition itself, well unless you are prepared to peacefully protest en mass (which I can't see happening) that petition is better than doing nothing, well that is unless you are happy with the way things are. Just remember though mate, the more you let them get away with stuff, the more it becomes easier to impose more stuff on you.
Blu
One of the biggest problems with UK shooting (IMO) at the moment is the lost and/or restriction of full-bore ranges - Low attendance only adds to the excuses that the MOD can use to close down ranges where the land can be sold...
...another 1000 shooters booking MOD ranges would make a big difference to the current eroding situation...