well im annoyed

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
Tony-c

Re: well im annoyed

#71 Post by Tony-c »

unauthorised access?? how does that work, so you cant show a mate the pile of bits on the table?

sounds like a total farce to me.

what about in your local RFD? somone looking at a rifle, or inspecting it etc, whats the difference
HALODIN

Re: well im annoyed

#72 Post by HALODIN »

Yes I'd like to know as well.
User avatar
Les
Posts: 4561
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:19 pm
Home club or Range: WRPC
Location: Runcorn, via Africa and parts unknown.
Contact:

Re: well im annoyed

#73 Post by Les »

The main point as far as I see it is - don't allow anybody to take pictures when your firearms are present, whether they are complete or not. kukkuk

Facebook, Twitter et al are the tools of the devil as far as firearms are concerned.
Jackmanuk

Re: well im annoyed

#74 Post by Jackmanuk »

so you can take a mate shooting and supervise him using your firearms but not holding it in bits in your home , and as for picture , they need to round up everyone that has ever taking a pic or stuck a video on you tube of them shooting or hunting or doing a review on a gun ....cause we would hate to promote the sport or anything
User avatar
DaveB
Posts: 1594
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:11 am
Home club or Range: Wellington Service Rifle Assocaition; NZ Deerstalkers Association; Wairarapa Pistol & Shooting Sports Club
Location: Upper Hutt, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: well im annoyed

#75 Post by DaveB »

Gaz wrote: Man had his certificates revoked and narrowly avoided a police prosecution - all because he took a picture of his neighbour sitting next to his dismantled rifle in his kitchen.
Only a complete martinet, drunk with his own power, would even consider actions of this sort as any kind of 'infraction'. Is that what the UK has come to??? Sad. Really, really sad. Glad my forbearers left the place!
Jackmanuk

Re: well im annoyed

#76 Post by Jackmanuk »

to the point in had i read the basc pages and they say the police should book appointments for spot checks , depending what they say tomorrow i may ring basc and see what they say
IainWR
Posts: 1424
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:43 pm
Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
Location: Bisley
Contact:

Re: well im annoyed

#77 Post by IainWR »

Jackmanuk wrote:to the point in had i read the basc pages and they say the police should book appointments for spot checks , depending what they say tomorrow i may ring basc and see what they say
"Hello Sir, may I have your membership number?"
User avatar
Les
Posts: 4561
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:19 pm
Home club or Range: WRPC
Location: Runcorn, via Africa and parts unknown.
Contact:

Re: well im annoyed

#78 Post by Les »

Jackmanuk wrote:so you can take a mate shooting and supervise him using your firearms but not holding it in bits in your home , and as for picture , they need to round up everyone that has ever taking a pic or stuck a video on you tube of them shooting or hunting or doing a review on a gun ....cause we would hate to promote the sport or anything
If somebody is looking at the hunting-shooting-rifle etc section of you tube, then they can expect to see guns, but you tube isn't twitter or facebook.

This country is full of people who have been conditioned to believe that guns are bad, so I would have thought that the last place to show pictures of them would be on a social media site. Perhaps it's just me. :roll:
Jackmanuk

Re: well im annoyed

#79 Post by Jackmanuk »

but not again there policy's and not breaking any laws
Stuck

Re: well im annoyed

#80 Post by Stuck »

Jackmanuk,

I haven't read all this thread in detail but if I've summarised it correctly it would seem that at some point(s) you have posted pictures of your safe & contents, some details of where you live (or an approximation) & your forum signature gives a detailed list of firearms & shotguns you own.

Each "transgression" on it's own may be trivial & even though if you put them all together you are "not breaking any laws" I put it to you that it probably wasn't a good idea!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests