Page 1 of 3
Shooting insurance
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:48 pm
by Gazza
I'm looking into shooting insurance mainly for the public liability side.
What are you chaps paying and who are you with? is there any to avoid?
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:57 am
by safetyfirst
For yourself or for a business?
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:05 am
by dromia
The gamekeepers associations are always worth a look, usually a damn sight cheaper than those BASC, NSRA and NRA shysters.
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:37 am
by Gazza
safetyfirst wrote:For yourself or for a business?
Not for business, just for myself
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:49 am
by Rockhopper
NSRA for me as that’s mostly what I shoot. They cover clay breaking as well
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 10:04 am
by redcat
Doesn't your gun club have PLI?
Redcat
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 10:12 am
by Rockhopper
It will have but that covers the club, not the individual shooter.
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:33 am
by Gazza
redcat wrote:Doesn't your gun club have PLI?
Redcat
I would think so yes but I want it for when Im shooting over land.
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:44 am
by dromia
Both the Scottish and English gamekeepers associations are £40/year membership which includes up to £10 million public liability insurance.
Re: Shooting insurance
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 12:58 pm
by hitchphil
dromia wrote:The gamekeepers associations are always worth a look, usually a damn sight cheaper than those BASC, NSRA and NRA shysters.
Far form being 'shysters' - The NRA's insurance covers all the std 2nd/3rd party cover required to £10m as per the Gamekeepers Assoc's Plus your equipment to £10k, Legal to £50k & own personal accident / injury too, and activities such as coaching or officiating, all for £78.50pa plus other membership benefits, ............ or you can save £38.50 & have less cover by following the bellicose view of one in particular who seems to use this forum to promote a personal and undermining anti NGO agenda?
NGO's have their faults, I & others have been critical of them in many ways, but they are Not Good Organisations from end to end just because of who / what they are. This forum too is openly criticised by shooters in many types of shooting organisations because of the poisoned view presented of NGOs by a very few in it. It undermines the forums credibility, respect & is imho counter productive.
Please change the record Domia every time you insult an organisation you insult & alienate many of its members too.
Your last post
dromia wrote: Both the Scottish and English gamekeepers associations are £40/year membership which includes up to £10 million public liability insurance.
is quite acceptable, informative, objective & impartial, your first the opposite, is one view as a moderator & the other a member?
