Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
That's one done, will get the rest modified after lunch...

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Tony-c wrote:does a bullet count as "other thing" OMG they all S5
No, bullet, shot and "missile" are already mentioned throughout the act. Discharge "other thing" includes stuff such as electricity, hence s5 status of stun guns.
With regards to front venting blank firers, I was of the opinion that it was specific to certain manufacturers, such as Bruni and Trinity revolvers because of the ease with which they can be converted. Didn't think it encompassed all....
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
I would not be surprised if the story told to Gunmart is only a small portion of the truth.
A bit like the story that was told here on FB only to found out a while after.....
Anyway, front venting blank fire pistols have always been a no-no since at least before the 80's. So this is really no news, or I suppose it is the news that some idiot thought the rules didnt apply to them.
Mark
A bit like the story that was told here on FB only to found out a while after.....
Anyway, front venting blank fire pistols have always been a no-no since at least before the 80's. So this is really no news, or I suppose it is the news that some idiot thought the rules didnt apply to them.
Mark
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Nope.Sim G wrote:With regards to front venting blank firers, I was of the opinion that it was specific to certain manufacturers, such as Bruni and Trinity revolvers because of the ease with which they can be converted. Didn't think it encompassed all....Tony-c wrote:does a bullet count as "other thing" OMG they all S5
The ban on specific makers was to NORMAL blank firers.
Front vent types have been illegal to own/import for a long time; they're very common in most EU states as a "less lethal" self-defence product, along with tear gas/pepper sprays, stun guns, etc.
WE don't need to defend ourselves in the UK, the STATE does that job for us - hence items carried for self defence being classed as "offensive weapons" under UK law
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Sim G wrote:Tony-c wrote:does a bullet count as "other thing" OMG they all S5
No, bullet, shot and "missile" are already mentioned throughout the act. Discharge "other thing" includes stuff such as electricity, hence s5 status of stun guns.
With regards to front venting blank firers, I was of the opinion that it was specific to certain manufacturers, such as Bruni and Trinity revolvers because of the ease with which they can be converted. Didn't think it encompassed all....
I wouldn't but that to the test now Simon, best to get rid ..... or plugged and side vented by a gunsmith, if that's even possible???
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
saddler wrote:That's one done, will get the rest modified after lunch...



Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
+1. Always the way with these sorting of stories.bigfathairybiker wrote:I would not be surprised if the story told to Gunmart is only a small portion of the truth.
A bit like the story that was told here on FB only to found out a while after.....
Anyway, front venting blank fire pistols have always been a no-no since at least before the 80's. So this is really no news, or I suppose it is the news that some idiot thought the rules didnt apply to them.
Mark
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
The point being, that despite these front venters being on dodgy ground for many years, this is the first time I have heard of someone being arrested, charged and prosecuted for ownership.
The story was relayed to me by Mike Wells and is covered in some detail on the Sportsmen's page in GunMart, its always worth keeping the community up to speed with shooting related legal stories, as you might well find FB members have such items tucked away and forgotten about.
The story was relayed to me by Mike Wells and is covered in some detail on the Sportsmen's page in GunMart, its always worth keeping the community up to speed with shooting related legal stories, as you might well find FB members have such items tucked away and forgotten about.
- Mattnall
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 2943
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:32 pm
- Home club or Range: NRA, Redricks TSC, BS1944RC, HRA
- Location: East Herts
- Contact:
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Oh dear,huntervixen wrote:
Sec5 b of the firearms act Any weapon of whatever description designed or adapted for the discharge of any noxious liquid, gas or other thing
So, first off, if anyone owns such a beast, get it to a Sec5 approved dealer for disposal straight away
On the same legal point, as 12 bore gas cartridges are manufactured, all 12 bore shotguns must also be regarded as Section 5! You will note the exact wording of 5b allows for no exceptions!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
aaarggh aaarggh
the wording says "designed or adapted".
My shotguns are not designed or adapted to fire gas but shot, the cartridges are though, that's why they'll be controlled.
Same as hollow point bullets are not all S5 just because they are hollow pointed. HP as a result of manufacturing process only is OK, but if they were designed to expand in a controlled manner then they will be S5.
Arming the Country, one gun at a time.
Good deals with Paul101, Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.
Good deals with Paul101, Charlotte the flyer, majordisorder, Charlie Muggins, among others. Thanks everybody.
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Oh dear,Mattnall wrote:huntervixen wrote:
Sec5 b of the firearms act Any weapon of whatever description designed or adapted for the discharge of any noxious liquid, gas or other thing
So, first off, if anyone owns such a beast, get it to a Sec5 approved dealer for disposal straight away
On the same legal point, as 12 bore gas cartridges are manufactured, all 12 bore shotguns must also be regarded as Section 5! You will note the exact wording of 5b allows for no exceptions!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
aaarggh aaarggh
the wording says "designed or adapted".
My shotguns are not designed or adapted to fire gas but shot, the cartridges are though, that's why they'll be controlled.
Same as hollow point bullets are not all S5 just because they are hollow pointed. HP as a result of manufacturing process only is OK, but if they were designed to expand in a controlled manner then they will be S5.[/quot
Seems very clear to me, a 12 bore shot gun is capable of firing a noxious liquid, so its Sec5b! It is designed so, because the gas round is designed to chamber in it and it can be adapted to fire said round by chambering it too.
Everyone is breaking the law


Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests