Dark Skies wrote:Fedaykin wrote:Come on guys are we failing reading comprehension today:
"The irony is I agree that to the general public CSR might well look scary" I was clearly talking in the hypothetical and referring to the pictures he puts online of his hunting escapades or are you saying that there is no images of UK CSR online?!
I was talking about perception and education. In that he is happy to educate the public about his shooting disciplines but not for those that he deems to be wrong.
But you need to be aware of things like CSR and go look for pics / vids online in order to be potentially 'scared' of them. The average pleb in the street doesn't even know it exists. Even other shooters aren't really that savvy as to what CSR is all about if their interest is blatting clays or punching holes in NRA targets or small bore in local ranges. They are more likely to be vaguely aware of its existence.
I'm with fedaykin on the point of picture availability. CSR pictures are available online easily, it's not necessarily that you have to go look for it. The NRA (UK) posts a lot about it. But you would need to be looking into what shooting is legal in the UK to find CSR, realistically, and I don't see it as a bad thing.
Ohh, you can legally shoot targets and move forwards and backwards towards a static paper target under strict supervision and engage them. Whoop-de-do.
The thing with all this "militaristic fantasy" is that guns are ultimately the major tool that military use, so of course theres going to be some crossover. Some guys from the military are going to get into civi shooting after or during their enlistment. Folks who couldn't or cant get into the armed forces are going to be interested in shooting and find their way into the sport, and some people who really wish they were soldiers for whatever reason are going to be interested in using the tools. So long as they're abiding by the law and not showing any extremist or maniacal behaviour, whose to say that it's wrong. It's within the remit of the law, they/we should not be persecuted from within.
There should be a line drawn by all shooters, that it is not against the law, we are perfectly legitimate in our reasons for owning and shooting these weapons in this manner, and most of all, all shooters should stick up for the sport in all it's aspects as the chipping away will only lead to tighter controls, more constriction within the laws, and ultimately lead to shootigns demise.
If only people like Yardley, realised the damage that he causes by his opinion on the matter.
Public perception is very much guided by the media, and who does the man work for (loosely)... the media.
He's a menace to himself, and all of us.