They will very likely make a statement however BASC/NRA and .50cal rifles/rapid firing rifles, not really something that they are interested in.
Could be wrong

Moderator: dromia
Joe,joe wrote: Is this official government policy or was slipped in by acpo etc ??0
I don't own (or plan to) own a 50 cal, but I believe they are being targeted unfairly. I certainly don't live in fear of "50 cal crime".I read the proposed consultation on "offensive weapons" with interest.
I'm interested to know what the motivation is to reclassify .50 calibre rifles to section 5 is (this effectively bans them)? Whilst 50 cal is on the extreme end of the power scale, I'm not sure this increases the risk to the public over other long range calibres (many are capable of even greater ranges due to ballistics).
Considering that only single shot rifles are available (no semi or full auto) and only target ammunition is available (no explosive or armour-piercing etc.) I don't believe they are more dangerous than other HME rifles. Add to the fact that unlike other target rifles, 50 cal is conditioned so only the specific licence holder can use it (on specific ranges you have to prove access to), I'd assert our existing controls are working.
I also believe there hasn't been a single case of one of these rifles being used in a crime - please correct me if I am wrong?
Excellent wordsMikaveli wrote:Here's what I posted on to Amber Rudd's Facebook page:
I don't own (or plan to) own a 50 cal, but I believe they are being targeted unfairly. I certainly don't live in fear of "50 cal crime".I read the proposed consultation on "offensive weapons" with interest.
I'm interested to know what the motivation is to reclassify .50 calibre rifles to section 5 is (this effectively bans them)? Whilst 50 cal is on the extreme end of the power scale, I'm not sure this increases the risk to the public over other long range calibres (many are capable of even greater ranges due to ballistics).
Considering that only single shot rifles are available (no semi or full auto) and only target ammunition is available (no explosive or armour-piercing etc.) I don't believe they are more dangerous than other HME rifles. Add to the fact that unlike other target rifles, 50 cal is conditioned so only the specific licence holder can use it (on specific ranges you have to prove access to), I'd assert our existing controls are working.
I also believe there hasn't been a single case of one of these rifles being used in a crime - please correct me if I am wrong?
Please write to you MPs and representatives - be polite, be positive and be constructive.
Thanks.
Gazza wrote:Excellent wordsMikaveli wrote:Here's what I posted on to Amber Rudd's Facebook page:
I don't own (or plan to) own a 50 cal, but I believe they are being targeted unfairly. I certainly don't live in fear of "50 cal crime".I read the proposed consultation on "offensive weapons" with interest.
I'm interested to know what the motivation is to reclassify .50 calibre rifles to section 5 is (this effectively bans them)? Whilst 50 cal is on the extreme end of the power scale, I'm not sure this increases the risk to the public over other long range calibres (many are capable of even greater ranges due to ballistics).
Considering that only single shot rifles are available (no semi or full auto) and only target ammunition is available (no explosive or armour-piercing etc.) I don't believe they are more dangerous than other HME rifles. Add to the fact that unlike other target rifles, 50 cal is conditioned so only the specific licence holder can use it (on specific ranges you have to prove access to), I'd assert our existing controls are working.
I also believe there hasn't been a single case of one of these rifles being used in a crime - please correct me if I am wrong?
Please write to you MPs and representatives - be polite, be positive and be constructive.
Thanks.![]()
If you do get a reply it will be what shes told to say and will not answer directly your questions anyway. I would be surprised if she even knows one end of a gun from the other.
May I also suggest everyone putting in a variation as soon as possible for a .50 and a lever release.
Mr E, its one thing to post on forums and in closed FaceBook groups..... but do you think it is wise to Publically post on senior politicians FB walls were possibly millions of members of the public (and the Police) can read you views on guns and shooting?Mikaveli wrote:Here's what I posted on to Amber Rudd's Facebook page:
I don't own (or plan to) own a 50 cal, but I believe they are being targeted unfairly. I certainly don't live in fear of "50 cal crime".
Please write to you MPs and representatives - be polite, be positive and be constructive.
Thanks.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests