Pippin89 wrote:[
I have made my views on the subject clear but to clarify, taking a life to save a more innocent life may be acceptable. Taking a life to save a more innocent person some trauma and/or injury.... becomes a little more hazy and something I cannot get on board with.
Then you are out of kilter with how many, many people see psychiatric harm. The effects are debilitating and overwhelming for the victim, leading sometimes to decades of suffering. So much so, that R v Burstow 1997, categorised psychiatric harm as grievous (really serious) bodily harm...
Pippin89 wrote: And the general public are not equipped to make that distinction in the heat of the moment. So arming them with lethal weapons (and yes the term weapon becomes appropriate at that point) and expecting them to make that decision is, in my opinion, foolish!
Even after 28 years employed in the criminal justice system, it appears I have a lot more faith in the general public, than you do, despite witnessing some of the most stupid behaviour conducted on a daily basis!
And, having a gun makes you no more armed than owning a guitar makes you a musician....
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!