dromia wrote:Metric?
Whats that? :?
![]()
A wonderful logical method of measurements that is sp logical that UK adopted it well after the others...
It is said it is still used in one of their former colonies....
LOL
R.G.C
Moderator: dromia
dromia wrote:Metric?
Whats that? :?
![]()
R.G.C wrote:dromia wrote:Metric?
Whats that? :?
![]()
A wonderful logical method of measurements that is sp logical that UK adopted it well after the others...
It is said it is still used in one of their former colonies....
LOL
R.G.C
David,ovenpaa wrote:Prototypes of two versions.
Firstly the Chombart inspired pocket version with large and small ends so it can be used down to .223 bolt faces with claw ejectors. It requires a vernier to confirm measurement. Simply measure and zero the gauge (50mm) then slacken the thumb screw and push the gauge over the protruding firing pin and lock the inner rod in place with the thumb screw, measure again and you will have the firing pin protrusion. This I will call the metric version :lol:
For those with an imperial bias there is the indicator type, sized for .223 bolt face and up set the gauge on a level surface and adjust the dial to zero, then simply push over the protruding firing pin and measure the distance on the gauge.
These are both working prototypes and the final designs may be tweaked slightly based on feedback.
dromia wrote:One of the reasons why I've always been suspicious of the metric system is because the French think its a good idea.
He simply needed 2 reserves...John25 wrote:If GOD had wanted us to be metric, there would only have been ten disciples!
:roll:
Dellboy wrote:dromia wrote:One of the reasons why I've always been suspicious of the metric system is because the French think its a good idea.
now that makes a lot of sense
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest