HALODIN wrote:There's an idea... I would say at £1,600 they're priced to sell, it certainly got me interested, but at £2k I start to lose interest.
I'll see what I can price one up for over the weekend. Incidentally, what's wrong with his rails?
techguy wrote:£1436 without any furniture. You can add the furniture for £135 (CTR buttstock, MOE grip, buffer tube kit) from a retailers with stock in the UK.
Which comes out to £1571 with the crappy SGC freefloat carbine handguard (you can add a sexy carbon fibre hand guard for £95). No magazines included in that price. But that was the 12" fluted barrel with brake.
There's your £1600 rifle :)
I'm pretty tempted by one myself at that price.. I'd order the glock mags in myself too. (before anyone asks, next export order isn't going in until early next year)
Nothing is wrong with the rails.. they do the job.. just personal preference really...
I have had a look at their rifle building website.
TBH I know bugger all about AR`s so wouldn't know if the add ons are worth it or even value for money.
Are the Glock mags modified in some way?
I still fancy one but not at 2k.
Tony
The AR parts are expensive from SGC. But then, every other retailer in the UK is expensive for Magpul parts. I won't post links, as this thread is not in the vendors section. Feel free to PM me if you want more info.
Anyway, the Glock mag version I think use standard mags (from what I have been told), the Uzi mag version had slight modifications to the mag as far as I know, but nothing beyond the scope of someone with a file.
Some women aren't classically good looking, but they have this strange beauty, it's a bit like this really. One of LanTac's rails would look nice on this.
Thanks. What price can you supply the 33rd mags for?
techguy wrote:I'm pretty tempted by one myself at that price.. I'd order the glock mags in myself too. (before anyone asks, next export order isn't going in until early next year)
Nothing is wrong with the rails.. they do the job.. just personal preference really...
HALODIN wrote:Some women aren't classically good looking, but they have this strange beauty, it's a bit like this really. One of LanTac's rails would look nice on this.
Really? Good god man that is one of the ugliest things I have ever seen, and I know ugly, I own a MAS36!
I will only shoot out to 50 yards in competition so the minimum legal length is all I need. Anything more is just weight up front to wave around and affect my aim.
If you are looking at primarily using open sights then perhaps that extra between sights may be worth while for you.
Thanks that makes sense, sight radius is probably the biggest factor. Interestingly I've just found this which kind of confirms anything longer than 12.5" probably isn't worth worrying about. Well that's what I tell the missus anyway.
Dangermouse wrote:For me Shorter is the preferred length.
I will only shoot out to 50 yards in competition so the minimum legal length is all I need. Anything more is just weight up front to wave around and affect my aim.
If you are looking at primarily using open sights then perhaps that extra between sights may be worth while for you.
(never been a fan of that magpul stock... much prefer the UBR)
