According to the Home Office ...

[Gazoo]

This is the same stupid home office that denies that there is even a bill of rights in existence! (If they did the 1997 1987 acts are illegal and void ) However, MPs, civil servents and others love to hide behind the bill of rights when it suits them !

The 1968 act is a 'shell issue' - qualified right no ware in any of the firearms acts does it state a need or permission for a lieance only for the a person to be certified (legal under the bill of rights ) tell this to the sheep they would scream for more controls and bans because "we dont want to be like armerica"

And another thing what an idiotic name (the home office ) for a justice department! Rant over

From what I read, the so called bill of rights is all about guaranteeing the rights of parliament and the landowners who are eligible to stand for it , not about rights of the citizens .

[joe]

This is the same stupid home office that denies that there is even a bill of rights in existence! (If they did the 1997 1987 acts are illegal and void ) However, MPs, civil servents and others love to hide behind the bill of rights when it suits them !

The 1968 act is a 'shell issue' - qualified right no ware in any of the firearms acts does it state a need or permission for a lieance only for the a person to be certified (legal under the bill of rights ) tell this to the sheep they would scream for more controls and bans because "we dont want to be like armerica"

And another thing what an idiotic name (the home office ) for a justice department! Rant over

From what I read, the so called bill of rights is all about guaranteeing the rights of parliament and the landowners who are eligible to stand for it , not about rights of the citizens .

Not it's not, if you read the preamble it states about the subjects rights ! The few clauses that is for mps is the article protecting freedom of speech in parliament !

Other articles ban cruel and usual punishments
The right to a jury trial etc