Re: Liverpool's loss is Manchester's gain.
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 8:33 am
It makes you wonder why fishing is so acceptable when game shooting isn't! Bullet to the chest and dead in seconds with minimal suffering..... Hook through the face and chucked into a bucket to suffocate.... I know which one I would prefer!MistAgain wrote:As the Council is the only shareholder in the exhibition centre , they will have lost income .RDC wrote:It's £5 mil in hospitality trade the city businesses would have made from the event occurring there, not an actual loss in squandered council money.ordnance wrote:They don't care, its not coming out of their pockets.
This comment is interesting ............"the show would not feature any trophy-hunting exhibitors and that this stipulation had been built into contracts."
So contracts existed , but had they been signed . If they had been signed the BSS could sue for breach of contract .
If they hadnt been signed , I wonder why not . What sort of a businessman promotes a show when he has no certainty of having the site to hold the show on ?
Unless of course the whole thing was just a spoiler and now he is backed into a corner and has to incorporate fishing to try and make the whole thing viable.