Page 19 of 22

Re: Vz58

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:18 pm
by Rburro2
Yeah I no I'm just curious to no when the side charger that says coming soon is going to be available. I appreciate Mr B does them.

Re: Vz58

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:21 pm
by John MH
Whatever scope is fitted to that its going to be far too high to be comfortable, it needs a cheek riser.

Re: Vz58

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:27 pm
by froggy
This is quite obscene actually ...

The Acog, calibrated for a nato 5.56 round, is about 3 times the price of a basic Vz shooting a 7,62x39 :o even if this one is in 223 ...
Not entirely convinced mounting such capitalist proletarian-oppressor optic makes any sense at all.
Only Meopta red dot is appropriate tool for good Vz weapon ! Cobra... maybe ... by only for old time sake
;)

What's next ?
Spetsnaz issued with hand cream ??

Re: Vz58

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:53 pm
by raybrown53
John MH wrote:Whatever scope is fitted to that its going to be far too high to be comfortable, it needs a cheek riser.
Actually my vortex strikefire reddot in its low mount sits quiet nicely. But if I was to mount a 1 - 4 scope I can easily add a cheek rest to the stock FAB do one for it. :)

Re: Vz58

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:51 pm
by snayperskaya
John MH wrote:
Rburro2 wrote:
How long are these side charging handles going to take its been six months already, I'm holding off buying one until they appear.
There is a chap in Essex that does AK Side Charger work.

Image
Just my opinion but I think that spoils the look of an AK.I have also seen these on Dragunovs and its sacrilege.

Re: Vz58

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:04 pm
by HALODIN
Even with a 12" barrel, it would still look the biz! :good:
raybrown53 wrote:Yeah it looks a tad short to me and oh to have it in semi auto let alone select fire.......

Re: Vz58

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:16 am
by Rburro2
snayperskaya wrote:
John MH wrote:
Rburro2 wrote:
How long are these side charging handles going to take its been six months already, I'm holding off buying one until they appear.
There is a chap in Essex that does AK Side Charger work.

Image
Just my opinion but I think that spoils the look of an AK.I have also seen these on Dragunovs and its sacrilege.
It does ruin the look but without they bite your fingers and cases can bounce of your hand and back in.

Re: Vz58

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:09 pm
by snayperskaya
[/quote]
It does ruin the look but without they bite your fingers and cases can bounce of your hand and back in.[/quote]

Not a problem i've had with either of my two AKs or my Drag, perhaps I've got funny shaped hands

Re: Vz58

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:27 pm
by HALODIN
There have been rumors to be fair...
snayperskaya wrote:perhaps I've got funny shaped hands

Re: Vz58

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:16 am
by raybrown53
snayperskaya wrote:
It does ruin the look but without they bite your fingers and cases can bounce of your hand and back in.[/quote]

Not a problem i've had with either of my two AKs or my Drag, perhaps I've got funny shaped hands[/quote]

On my AK I have the Rus Mil enlarge bolt handle seem to work ok though if you don't pull back sharply you do at times get a round bounce back of your knuckles (especially big hairy sausage fingered hands like mine)

On my Vz58 again pull back sharply and no issues but on occasion a case will bounce off knuckles and land back in the rifle, a cam charging handle will negate this and make cycling the rifle much quicker :)

While I agree putting a cam on an AK spoils the look I think it would make the operation much nice and cycling the rifle much quicker also.