VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Message

#51 Post by **mag41uk** » Thu May 15, 2014 11:20 am

mackie wrote:A 9mm would make the most sense for me as I could shoot it every week but one of these is .223 would be sweet. Would it be eligible for CSR?

It will be interesting to see how this fits into CSR.

techguy · #52 Post by **techguy** » Thu May 15, 2014 11:31 am

I would think they would need to be in their own category.

subvers10n · #53 Post by **subvers10n** » Thu May 15, 2014 11:38 am

I'm getting a 404 not found error for that dropbox link... :-(

Sent from my Toilet 10 using "An application"

HALODIN · #54 Post by **HALODIN** » Thu May 15, 2014 11:41 am

Try this link:

http://107.20.172.65/u/40938739/Vz58%20 ... totype.mp4

subvers10n wrote:I'm getting a 404 not found error for that dropbox link... :-(

Sent from my Toilet 10 using "An application"

#55 Post by **Blackstuff** » Thu May 15, 2014 11:53 am

techguy wrote:I would think they would need to be in their own category.

I think getting the NRA not to sh!t bricks would be the first stage of getting them used in CSR :lol: It would be a good opportunity for them to make amends for screwing over SLR shooters following the Hungerford investigation though

John MH · #56 Post by **John MH** » Thu May 15, 2014 12:04 pm

techguy wrote:I would think they would need to be in their own category.

Propably not unless they appear to offer a significant advantage, which at this point I don't see across all matches. They would need to be proved to be safe to use in CSR Type competition as far as fire and move goes as not enough is known about them at the moment. Nothing in the curent CSR Classes would prevent them being used.

Gaz · #57 Post by **Gaz** » Thu May 15, 2014 12:20 pm

If only it was cheaper...

breacher · #58 Post by **breacher** » Thu May 15, 2014 12:23 pm

DW58 wrote:Well that's certainly different.

Indeed.

I wonder if it will be patented or will we start seeing lots of similar ?

Can the bolt be moved forward on an empty magwell ?

#59 Post by **Cj10** » Thu May 15, 2014 2:44 pm

I was concerned when I purchased one of the original lever release 9mm rifles the Home Secretary would declare them to be especially dangerous, and thus prohibit them under the 1988 Act without the need for primary legislation.

Having watched the video i am amazed there has been no push back from the Home Office, with veiled threats of the above.

fred2892 · #60 Post by **fred2892** » Thu May 15, 2014 3:45 pm

HALODIN wrote:Try this link:

http://107.20.172.65/u/40938739/Vz58%20 ... totype.mp4

subvers10n wrote:I'm getting a 404 not found error for that dropbox link... :-(

Sent from my Toilet 10 using "An application"

Getting a 404 error with this link too, dammit would really like to see this operating.

Sent from my Transformer TF101 using "An application"

The UK's Finest Independent Forum for Shooters and Gun Owners. Est 2010.

VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Re: VZ.58 M.A.R.S

Who is online