
Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
And that is what makes said law an ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That can't even be turned into glue afterwards. 

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh
Mark
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh

Mark
- meles meles
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
- Home club or Range: HBSA
- Location: Underground
- Contact:
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Silly and not serious ? On here?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Ok I'll admit I got a bit overboard, but if Hunter vixen's interpretation is the right one and taken to its logical extreme then yes the law is a buggered up mess. One of the reasons having the house of commons full of chimps would be not a bad thing is that we can teach the chimps and right from wrong and they'll mainly fling poo in the commons and not outside of it.bigfathairybiker wrote:I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh![]()
Mark
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Sixshot6 wrote:Ok I'll admit I got a bit overboard, but if Hunter vixen's interpretation is the right one and taken to its logical extreme then yes the law is a buggered up mess. One of the reasons having the house of commons full of chimps would be not a bad thing is that we can teach the chimps and right from wrong and they'll mainly fling poo in the commons and not outside of it.bigfathairybiker wrote:I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh![]()
Mark
How Very true...... clapclap ....... While my Sec5b shotgun post is a little "tongue in cheek"

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
And considering some MP's are former lawyers it speaks volumes of why they stopped practicing.huntervixen wrote:Sixshot6 wrote:Ok I'll admit I got a bit overboard, but if Hunter vixen's interpretation is the right one and taken to its logical extreme then yes the law is a buggered up mess. One of the reasons having the house of commons full of chimps would be not a bad thing is that we can teach the chimps and right from wrong and they'll mainly fling poo in the commons and not outside of it.bigfathairybiker wrote:I hope I'm reading that all these posts are just being silly and not serious.
Otherwise there really is a lot of misunderstanding of written legal documents.
aaarggh![]()
Mark
How Very true...... clapclap ....... While my Sec5b shotgun post is a little "tongue in cheek", it does raise the issue of our ridiculous contradictory and darn right flawed Firearms laws, just have a read through the Firearms Act......(It took me 10 mins to find the 12 bore issue) If it was a legal contract that you had paid a solicitor to draft, you you would sue them for incompetence!
Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
I offered advice to the guy concerned.
He got prosecuted not because his guns were front venting but because he had the cup device necessary to discharge CS and he had CS canisters for discharge.
It has previously been proven in court that because something can be adapted to be illegal does not mean it is itself illegal.
A fairy liquid bottle is not illegal but fill it with acid/ammonia and its lethal.
If the blank firer was designed to discharge a missile from the outset its section 5.
He got prosecuted not because his guns were front venting but because he had the cup device necessary to discharge CS and he had CS canisters for discharge.
It has previously been proven in court that because something can be adapted to be illegal does not mean it is itself illegal.
A fairy liquid bottle is not illegal but fill it with acid/ammonia and its lethal.
If the blank firer was designed to discharge a missile from the outset its section 5.
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Countryman wrote:I offered advice to the guy concerned.
He got prosecuted not because his guns were front venting but because he had the cup device necessary to discharge CS and he had CS canisters for discharge.
No further comment, M'lud.zanes wrote:+1. Always the way with these sorting of stories.bigfathairybiker wrote:I would not be surprised if the story told to Gunmart is only a small portion of the truth.
A bit like the story that was told here on FB only to found out a while after.....

Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Not for him he got 2 years
Re: Front venting blank fire pistols are most defiantly Sec5
Countryman wrote:Not for him he got 2 years
More to do with the CS, than with the "gun"?
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests