Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7859
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#1 Post by Blackstuff »

The following were a series of questions someone from Facebook asked Vicky Ford and the responses from her delegate. I've tried to separate them out as the original post was jumbled once it was copied from the email to FB;

Dear Mrs Ford
I have read your update and am left unsure on parts. In the UK we have several types of firearms.
Only Section 1 (S1) shotguns and .22 rimfires (RF) can be Semi auto.
As RF are exempt this leaves (S1) shotguns.
Can you confirm to me that :
"Therefore a semi-automatic firearm remains Category B unless the high capacity magazine is fitted."
Means a S1 shotgun stays in the same legal position it currently is as long as only up to 10 round magazines are used / owned for it.
However we have several other firearms which are not semi auto in the UK. All of which have some sort of manual action. (For example bolt actions.)
Many of these take what you are referring to as "high capacity” magazines. They are not semi auto yet are greater than 60cm in length.
"Following lengthy negotiations, it was agreed that for long firearms exceeding 60 cm a magazine with a capacity greater than 10 rounds would be restricted, while for a short firearm the limit would be at 20 rounds. This was a major negotiating point for the European Council."
Is the magazine ban (or required authorisation) for all magazines in all types of firearms or are magazines for RF and non semi auto CF rifles exempt?
Lastly magazines age. A magazine that once held 10 rounds over time may eventually hold 11 and with a little effort. As long as it had not been purposely tampered with how would this effect its legal position as the owner would not necessary know this had occurred.
Shotgun magazine are often tubular. Whilst a magazine may hold 10 standard size shotgun carts shorter cartridges can be found. Several more 2 inch cartridges could theoretically fit into this tube.
In the UK. This could already happen in Section 2 (S2) semi auto shotguns. Which are limited to 3 cartridges in the gun and held on a shotgun certificate. Both the police and the home office are aware off this flaw but accept it and the general instruction given by issuing forces is “don't and if we find out you are we will revoke your certificate”. In reality this not an issue as these gun are unlikely to be able to cycle with this type of cartridge.
I realise that this maybe all premature from a UK perspective due to “Brexit”.
Thank you

Their response.

Dear Mr Hartley,
On behalf of Mrs Ford please find the following remarks below in red. I hope this proves useful to clarify some of the queries you raised.
Best wishes,
Raphael Papamichael

Dear Mrs Ford
I have read your update and am left unsure on parts. In the UK we have several types of firearms.
Only Section 1 (S1) shotguns and .22 rimfires (RF) can be Semi auto.
As RF are exempt this leaves (S1) shotguns.
Can you confirm to me that :
"Therefore a semi-automatic firearm remains Category B unless the high capacity magazine is fitted."
Means a S1 shotgun stays in the same legal position it currently is as long as only up to 10 round magazines are used / owned for it.

[Yes.]

However we have several other firearms which are not semi auto in the UK. All of which have some sort of manual action. (For example bolt actions.)
Many of these take what you are referring to as "high capacity” magazines. They are not semi auto yet are greater than 60cm in length.

"Following lengthy negotiations, it was agreed that for long firearms exceeding 60 cm a magazine with a capacity greater than 10 rounds would be restricted, while for a short firearm the limit would be at 20 rounds. This was a major negotiating point for the European Council."
Is the magazine ban (or required authorisation) for all magazines in all types of firearms or are magazines for RF and non semi auto CF rifles exempt?

[It's not a magazine "ban" it's a restriction on owning BOTH a semi auto CF AND a high cap mag used for CF ammunition that fits that specific firearm. Magazines for rim-fire are not covered by this restriction. The restriction does not make owning both illegal but makes it clear that then owner risks losing their licence. Only those with an authorisation to hold Cat A firearms are permitted to acquire high capacity mags. A transition period is foreseen for this new authorisation.]

Lastly magazines age. A magazine that once held 10 rounds over time may eventually hold 11 and with a little effort. As long as it had not been purposely tampered with how would this effect its legal position as the owner would not necessary know this had occurred.

[Not discussed.]

Shotgun magazine are often tubular. Whilst a magazine may hold 10 standard size shotgun carts shorter cartridges can be found. Several more 2 inch cartridges could theoretically fit into this tube.

[In this case it may be a theoretical possibility, but we view this as an issue of proper implementation which would be based on the production capacity of the magazine, i.e. the magazine's standard capacity without modification. The example provided of the UK approach is a sensible one.]

This seems provide some clarity with how things would be affected in the UK context, basically rimfires fine, straight-pull, lever/trigger release, bolt action etc etc fine, semi-auto shotguns with either tube or detachable magazines DESIGNED as 10 rds or less fine, semi-auto shotguns with tube or box mag exceeding 10rds require authorization/exemption. I can only presume that the exemption in the UK would take the form of a condition on your FAC.

I would urge EVERYONE who can*, to apply for the condition even if you have no intention of fitting a 11rd+ magazine to your gun in order to 'normalise' it within police FLD departments so those that need it don't also have to put up with oblivious FEO's who have seemingly never heard of it.

*i.e. those that use FAC shotguns for competition.

What this does however clearly show is that the proposals have nothing whatsoever to do with fighting terrorism/crime as possession of a 'high-capacity' magazine ISN'T going to be illegal. Possession of such a magazine by a LEGAL SHOOTER (who owns a centre-fire semi-auto rifle/shotgun that it would fit in), without authorization would result in their certificate being revoked :o ****
DVC
User avatar
BamBam
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: Royston vasey
Contact:

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#2 Post by BamBam »

Not UK law, this will only happen if UK adopts the changes and as yet I've not heard of any plans for them to do so.
Image
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7859
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#3 Post by Blackstuff »

What are you basing that on?? Not 'Brexit' I hope lol

If we (the UK) weren't planning on having anything to do with I would've thought Vicky Ford would have been replaced and all UK MEP's wouldn't be involved?

Every response from MP's/MEP's I've had or read are in the context that it is a certainty as have all the press releases from UK national shooting bodies.

It is happening and we will feel it. Its only the matter of fact and degree which is up for debate.
DVC
User avatar
BamBam
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: Royston vasey
Contact:

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#4 Post by BamBam »

No, not brexit.

I will wait and see if the changes are put in the Firearms guidance. Very little change for us really, so they might not bother.
Image
Fedaykin

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#5 Post by Fedaykin »

So a complex gibberish dogs dinner set of regulations that will be difficult or even impossible to impose on a group of people WHO BROKE NO LAWS!

So a semi auto CF with a mag capacity more than 10 will be restricted ignoring the minor issue that magazines above ten rounds tend to be mass produced items that are interchangeable between multiple firearms. That isn't touching upon the magazines that can be used between different types of guns. For our fellow European shooters (and us in certain circumstances is going to lead to some truly absurd situtations) For example:

M14/M1A 20rd Magazine:
Image

This magazine is compatible with the M14 a perfectly legal rifle in Europe:
Image

It is also compatible with the Mossberg MVP bolt action:
Image

So you could have a situation where somebody buys both rifles in the same calibre but will only be able to buy a 10rd for the Semi Auto but a 20rd for the bolt action. Of course when they get home what is stopping them putting the 20rd in the semi auto? You will get the same issue with .223 AR15 magazines!

You will get the same silly situation as Canada with those silly flipped 10rd mags, I also vaguely remember the talk of Grandfathering the high cap mags already in circulation due to how difficult it will be to find them all leading to another absurd level of bureaucratic nonsense.

Anybody in the know knows that capacity doesn't make much of a difference when they are detachable:


Legislation drafted by people who have not a clue about guns!

wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead wallhead
HALODIN

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#6 Post by HALODIN »

This is bureaucratic claptrap in my opinion and I believe it will be dropped once they realise it won't stop terrorism, it's completely unworkable and extremely expensive to police.
artiglio

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#7 Post by artiglio »

Halodin, Very unlikely the EU apparatus will drop the matter, probably a very different story when it comes to enforcement by the member states. As you say it would be a hugely expensive exercise to implement, many governments would probably feel the resources were better deployed elsewhere.
saddler

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#8 Post by saddler »

Any inclusion in the draft about restricting access to HGV's??
HALODIN

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#9 Post by HALODIN »

I didn't mean the whole ban, just the proposed magazine limit ban. Are we talking about the same thing?

I'm of the opinion there will be considerable resistance from member states and on top of that and given Britain's imminent exit from the EU, Britain may refuse to implement an EU firearms directive.
artiglio wrote:Halodin, Very unlikely the EU apparatus will drop the matter, probably a very different story when it comes to enforcement by the member states. As you say it would be a hugely expensive exercise to implement, many governments would probably feel the resources were better deployed elsewhere.
Racalman
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:21 am
Home club or Range: LPSC and NRA
Location: Berkshire
Contact:

Re: Questions/answers from Vivky Fords office re: EU ban

#10 Post by Racalman »

HALODIN wrote:I'm of the opinion there will be considerable resistance from member states and on top of that and given Britain's imminent exit from the EU, Britain may refuse to implement an EU firearms directive.
Only time will tell, but this is my view also.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests