NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
joe

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#21 Post by joe »

Strangely Brown wrote:
joe wrote:Once again the NRA never ceases to amaze me !
Joe, once again you never cease to amaze me with your, "I should be allowed to carry" policy etc.

I know you shoot NRA competitions, McQueens (I wont mention the sandbag!) and CSR.
Have you not ever considered that the NRA (GB) has nothing to do with lobbying the government for carrying firearms for self defence but has everything to do with marksmanship!

From the NRA Charter.

1) OBJECTS

The objects of the National Rifle Association (in these rules referred to as “the Association”) are the promotion and encouragement of Marksmanship throughout the Queen’s Dominions, in the interests of Defence and the Permanence of the Volunteer and Auxiliary Forces, Naval, Military and Air.1

Never mentioned anything about self defence ! Only the hypocrisy of politicians ! And that is the point of the post ! Not about demanding Ccw etc its this Do as I say, not as I do by them attitude
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7859
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#22 Post by Blackstuff »

Strangely Brown wrote:
From the NRA Charter.

1) OBJECTS

The objects of the National Rifle Association (in these rules referred to as “the Association”) are the promotion and encouragement of Marksmanship throughout the Queen’s Dominions, in the interests of Defence and the Permanence of the Volunteer and Auxiliary Forces, Naval, Military and Air.1
I've never seen that before but that reads to me that defence, surely encompassing self-defence, IS an objective of the NRA?! 5mith If the 'Defence' had of been followed by a comma instead of an 'and' may be not but....
DVC
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20245
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#23 Post by dromia »

"in the interests of Defence and the Permanence of the Volunteer and Auxiliary Forces, Naval, Military and Air.1"

I'd like to see how the NRA interprets that and measures their success in achieving that object.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2860
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#24 Post by Dark Skies »

Airbrush wrote:Joe you're really not doing us any favours with your political views on gun ownership, if it means that much to you, move to the US.
It's not even that easy in the USA - I lived in Ohio for a while (married to a US citizen).

Federal buildings, bars, banks, and other places often won't / definitely wont permit entry with a firearm so you have to leave it at a check in / in your car / with a friend standing outside - it gets to be a pain when you just want to nip in somewhere in your lunch break / on the way home / spur of the moment, whilst I'm passing deals.
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
User avatar
Strangely Brown
Posts: 414
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 8:15 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Location: New Forest
Contact:

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#25 Post by Strangely Brown »

joe wrote:Never mentioned anything about self defence ! Only the hypocrisy of politicians ! And that is the point of the post ! Not about demanding Ccw etc its this Do as I say, not as I do by them attitude
No you didn't mention self defence, but the picture you used to illustrate your point was taken in the USA of a US politician and sent to the FB page of the NRA of........Great Britain??

If you continue in this manner I may have to break my silence regarding the sandbag......................you have been warned!
Mick
Fedaykin

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#26 Post by Fedaykin »

joe wrote:
Never mentioned anything about self defence ! Only the hypocrisy of politicians ! And that is the point of the post ! Not about demanding Ccw etc its this Do as I say, not as I do by them attitude
By using a picture from the US which is used to argue for CCW?! A rather asinine position you are taking frankly.

A politician like Hillary Clinton as shown in this picture is a high risk target just the same as a senior politician here or a senior member of the Royal family.

Overt signs of security for these kinds of people enhance public safety by showing the average Whacko that taking a punt would be a dangerous exercise. Just walk through the centre of London and you will see the Met tooled up with every imaginable weapon. This is sensible and hardly a sign of hypocrisy by any party.

I hate defending the UK NRA here but they are a Sporting Charity and they have to stay out of particular subjects, putting US pro CCW imagery on their Facebook page is not helpful to their cause and only fuel for organisations like MAG, Continuity ACPO, NABIS and people like Peter Squires to attack sports shooters.

The UK NRA has to maintain a squeaky clean non-political position within their social media presence, that is not to abrogate them of their failures like failing to stand up for SLR or Pistol shooters but there is a PR war being thought here.

I should also suggest you look at the latest copy of Gun Mart and the Sportsman Association article where they talk about two people who nearly lost their tickets (they did actually until appealed) because of what they were posting and liking on Facebook. When you hit renewal Joe there is a good chance that your local Plod will be looking at your Facebook profile, I suggest you carefully weigh what you post on it!
breacher

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#27 Post by breacher »

Two words for you Joe - risk assessment.

Those people surrounded by armed body guards are generally those to which a specific threat has been identified.

Yes - terrorism and crime affect us all and could happen to any of us. But some are specific targets and get guarded accordingly.

As to "self defence" - in your ideal world, we would all have that right. But...........so would those who feel unable to go out at the weekend without getting drunk asap and having a fight over some nonsense. And those who feel unable to watch a football match without utter hatred for the opposition turning into a fight at every oportunity.

They say guns dont kill people, people kill people ? Well, looking around me - I dont see enough civic responsibility, common sense and restraint in the UK population. I see too many people that I would not like to see armed.
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7859
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#28 Post by Blackstuff »

Fedaykin wrote:
Overt signs of security for these kinds of people enhance public safety by showing the average Whacko that taking a punt would be a dangerous exercise. Just walk through the centre of London and you will see the Met tooled up with every imaginable weapon. This is sensible and hardly a sign of hypocrisy by any party.
Maybe in the US, and granted the picture is of US citizens, but in the UK its a different story. The Police Guide to Firearms Licensing specifically says,
"Applications for the grant of a firearm certificate for the applicant’s, or another’s, protection, or that of premises, should be refused on the grounds that firearms are not an acceptable means of protection in Great Britain. It has been the view of successive Governments for many years that the private possession and carriage of firearms for personal protection is likely to lead to an increase in levels of violence."

And the people saying that are sitting behind armed guards. So what if they're more likely to be a target. Smokers and old people are more likely to have fires in their homes, maybe they should get a priority fire service??
Fedaykin wrote: I should also suggest you look at the latest copy of Gun Mart and the Sportsman Association article where they talk about two people who nearly lost their tickets (they did actually until appealed) because of what they were posting and liking on Facebook. When you hit renewal Joe there is a good chance that your local Plod will be looking at your Facebook profile, I suggest you carefully weigh what you post on it!
Those people were 'liking' and sharing ridiculously racist/xenophobic BNP/EDL type propaganda. There are laws against racism and religious prejudice, not calling politicians idiots teanews
breacher wrote: As to "self defence" - in your ideal world, we would all have that right. But...........so would those who feel unable to go out at the weekend without getting drunk asap and having a fight over some nonsense. And those who feel unable to watch a football match without utter hatred for the opposition turning into a fight at every oportunity.

They say guns dont kill people, people kill people ? Well, looking around me - I dont see enough civic responsibility, common sense and restraint in the UK population. I see too many people that I would not like to see armed.
No system in the world (AFAIK) permits ANYONE to own firearms without exception. Even in the most rootin' tootin' states in the US the 2nd Amendment is a qualified right. 'Gun free zones' ( lol ) in football stadiums, pubs, nightclubs and a carry drinking limit, similar to/less than the drink driving limit would counter all of the examples given above.
DVC
breacher

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#29 Post by breacher »

Actually in the real world some premises DO get a better response from the fire brigade depending on what is produced / stored there.

Just like a RFD will probably get a faster response to his alarm than the response to Joe Bloggs garden shed alarm activation.

As to "countering the examples above" - you miss my point. I am indicating a general lack of respect for the law. Your solution just accepts they are yobs but stops them carrying a gun in locations where they are at their most yobbish.
User avatar
RDC
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 12:14 pm
Contact:

Re: NRA Facebook page they don't like being political

#30 Post by RDC »

christel wrote:If anyone can post whatever on the NRA faceshoite page then why not that picture?

Freedom of speech/thought anyone?

You can only post whatever you like on the NRA facebook page insomuch as you can post whatever you like on forum like this.

Post something that isn't relevent or is purposefully inflammatory and chances are it will be binned.

Joe knows full well that the NRA Facebook page is not the place for his purported message and the content and context of the image posted is irrelevant to an organisation that promotes target shooting sports in the UK.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests